16 In this light, feminine fetishism–the significance of girl to “contest reality” and to “deny that she’s lacking a dick”–can be redtube interpreted in Acker’s belated act as a disavowal of lobotomy as a type of castration with which ladies (but not just ladies) are threatened.
As a result, it really is indistinguishable through the declaration that is performative of own possibility. Just like, based on Butler, the phallus attains its status being a performative statement (Bodies 83), so too Acker’s announcement of feminine fetishism, read because the culmination of her pointed assaults on penis envy, situates the feminine fetish when you look at the interpretive space opened between your penis as well as the phallus as privileged signifier. This statement defetishizes the “normal” fetishes during the base of the Lacanian and Freudian types of feminine heterosexuality: for Lacan, your penis once the biological signifier of “having” the phallus, as well as for Freud, the infant because the only appropriate replacement for that shortage, it self a signifier of a solely feminine capability that is biological. However the fetish in Acker finally replaces something which exists in neither Freud nor Lacan; it functions as the replacement a partially deconstructed penis/phallus that plays the role of both terms and of neither. Maybe for this reason Acker devotes therefore little awareness of explaining the fetish item it self; it really is just as if the representation of the item would divert an excessive amount of attention through the complex nature of exactly exactly just what it disavows. Airplane’s cross-dressing is just one of these of a pattern that recurs throughout Acker’s fiction, by which an apparently fetishistic training, while the fear it can help to assuage, is described without proportional increased exposure of the thing (in this instance male clothes). Read more